@article {1892,
	title = {Church In The Public Sphere: Production Of Meaning Between Rational And Irrational},
	journal = {Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies},
	volume = {Vol 13},
	year = {2014},
	month = {07/2014},
	pages = {3-20},
	chapter = {3},
	abstract = {In the public sphere and especially in the media, the discourse on the Church and about the Church on faith and religion is often tainted by the confusion of meaning due, among other things, to the mutual borrowing less rigorous {\textendash} epistemologically and methodologically {\textendash} of the concepts which engage various disciplines (theology, sociology, anthropology, political science, information and communication science, and so on) who take possession of problematic centered on the relation between mankind and divinity. This article presents some basic benchmarks for analyzing and understanding the construction of meaning as well as the rationality or irrationality of these issues by convening the disciplinary distinction between the content of the concepts of organization and that of the institution.},
	keywords = {Church, Faith, media, production of meaning, public sphere, religion, symbolic forms},
	issn = {1583-0039},
	url = {http://jsri.ro/ojs/index.php/jsri/article/view/741},
	author = {Bratosin, Stefan}
}
@proceedings {1891,
	title = {M{\'e}dia, spiritualit{\'e} et la{\"\i}cit{\'e} : Regards crois{\'e}s franco-roumains},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {146},
	publisher = {Iarsic},
	edition = {Iarsic},
	address = {Les Arcs/France},
	abstract = {This scientific event brought together different authorities, academic institutions and political and media organizations at the Villa No{\"e}l in Bucharest to make an assessment on the sensitive questions related to religious freedom and liberty of conscience, on spirituality and secularity, full of meaning symbols, with a significant emotional and ethical charge. This book is a contribution to the public sphere debate on the secularity and the spirituality in the service of freedom considering two paradigmatic cases, two European countries: Romania {\textendash} statistically the most religious country of Europe, and France {\textendash} statistically the less religious country of Europe.
***
Cette manifestation scientifique a r{\'e}uni diff{\'e}rentes instances, institutions et organisations acad{\'e}miques, politiques et m{\'e}diatiques {\`a} la Villa No{\"e}l afin de dresser un bilan sur les questionnements sensibles li{\'e}s {\`a} la libert{\'e} religieuse et de conscience, {\`a} la spiritualit{\'e} et {\`a} la la{\"\i}cit{\'e}, symboles charg{\'e}s de sens intellectuel, {\'e}thique et {\'e}motionnel. Les communications sont une contribution au d{\'e}bat concernant la prise de distance {\'e}pist{\'e}mologique et {\'e}thique {\guillemotleft} politiquement correct {\guillemotright} pour une la{\"\i}cit{\'e} et une spiritualit{\'e} au service de la libert{\'e} en consid{\'e}rant deux cas paradigmatiques, deux pays europ{\'e}ens, la Roumanie et la France, dont l{\textquoteright}un est statistiquement le plus religieux de l{\textquoteright}Europe et l{\textquoteright}autre le moins religieux, et qui, dans leurs espaces publics respectifs, d{\'e}clinent diff{\'e}remment la relation entre spiritualit{\'e} et la{\"\i}cit{\'e}.},
	keywords = {France, la{\"\i}cit{\'e}, media, secularity, Spirituality},
	isbn = {978-2953245066},
	issn = {978-2953245066},
	url = {http://iarsic.com/en/product/media-spiritualite-et-laicite-regards-croises-franco-roumains/},
	author = {Bratosin, Stefan}
}
@article {1920,
	title = {La m{\'e}dialisation du religieux dans la th{\'e}orie du post n{\'e}o-protestantisme},
	journal = {Social Compass},
	volume = {Vol. 63},
	year = {2016},
	month = {July/2016},
	pages = {1-16},
	type = {peer reviewed},
	chapter = {1},
	abstract = {This article proposes a theory of post neo-Protestantism highlighting the key relationships maintained by this new postmodern manner of thinking and living religion with the medialization, that is to say, with the {\textquoteleft}mediatization of everything{\textquoteright} as a model of public communication developed in favor of broadband internet, wireless internet or social media. In this perspective, it is shown that post neo-Protestantism is basically the virtualization of neo-Protestantism still clinging to modernity and the communicative individual pragmatics of this virtualization now inescapably linked to new media.},
	keywords = {internet, medialization, post neo-Protestantism, postmodernism, religion},
	issn = {14617404},
	doi = {10.1177/0037768616652335},
	url = {http://scp.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/07/19/0037768616652335.full.pdf?ijkey=mTGIzHzyxkVZAYF\&keytype=finite},
	author = {Bratosin, Stefan}
}
@proceedings {1890,
	title = {Espace public et communication de la foi},
	year = {2014},
	month = {12/2014},
	pages = {510},
	publisher = {Iarsic},
	edition = {Iarsic},
	address = {Les Arcs/France},
	abstract = {Questioning the faith in its communicability in the public sphere is an open issue. This book is the evidence that, according to Gilbert Durand reflection on the sacred expressed in an interview for Essachess - Journal for Communication Studies in 2011, shortly before his death, the communication of faith in the public sphere seems "both changing and unchanging", changing because the communication as production of the meaning in a practiced context makes it changing and unchanging because it is always related to a single Truth.

***
Interroger la foi dans sa communicabilit{\'e} dans l{\textquoteright}espace public demeure un chantier ouvert. Cet ouvrage repr{\'e}sente le t{\'e}moignage que, selon une r{\'e}flexion de Gilbert Durand sur le sacr{\'e} exprim{\'e}e dans un entretien pour Essachess - Journal for Communication Studies en 2011, peu avant sa mort, la communication de la foi dans l{\textquoteright}espace public semble {\guillemotleft} {\`a} la fois changeante et immuable {\guillemotright}, changeante car la communication comme production de sens dans un contexte pratiqu{\'e} la rend changeante et immuable car elle reste toujours li{\'e}e {\`a} une seule et unique V{\'e}rit{\'e}.},
	keywords = {communication {\textendash} group and community, Faith, public sphere, religion},
	isbn = {978-2953245028},
	issn = {978-2953245028},
	url = {http://iarsic.com/en/product/espace-public-et-communication-de-la-foi/},
	author = {Bratosin, Stefan and Tudor, Mihaela-Alexandra}
}
@conference {1894,
	title = {La foi et le langage : paradigmes de sens pour les m{\'e}dias},
	booktitle = {4th Workshop international Essachess: M{\'e}dia, spiritualit{\'e} et la{\"\i}cit{\'e} : Regards crois{\'e}s franco-roumains},
	year = {2015},
	month = {12/2015},
	publisher = {Iarsic},
	organization = {Iarsic},
	address = {Bucarest-Villa Noel},
	abstract = {Cette communication t{\^a}chera de montrer dans la perspective d{\textquoteright}une {\'e}pist{\'e}mologie sociale que les paradigmes de sens irr{\'e}ductibles pour toute type de m{\'e}diatisation sont la foi et le langage. Elle produira une argumentation en faveur de l{\textquoteright}hypoth{\`e}se que ce qui est fondamentalement sp{\'e}cifique pour les diff{\'e}rents approches m{\'e}diatiques de la r{\'e}alit{\'e} ne r{\'e}side pas dans la production de sens, mais dans la direction que chaque type de m{\'e}diatisation se donne pour orienter la vie de l{\textquoteright}individu, de la soci{\'e}t{\'e} et d{\textquoteright}une mani{\`e}re g{\'e}n{\'e}rale du monde. Enfin, la communication apportera une lecture de la libert{\'e} de conscience dans ce contexte o{\`u} l{\textquoteright}{\^e}tre humain - un existant donn{\'e} - doit s{\textquoteright} "in-former" sous la pression de l{\textquoteright}{\^e}tre social - un existant historique construit collectivement.},
	keywords = {Faith, freedom of opinion, language, media, mediatization, religion, secularization},
	isbn = {978-2-9532450-6-6},
	url = {http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/45600/ssoar-2015-bratosin-La_foi_et_le_langage.pdf?sequence=3},
	author = {Bratosin, Stefan}
}
@conference {1895,
	title = {Representations de la diversit{\'e} religieuse {\`a} la t{\'e}l{\'e}vision publique},
	booktitle = {4th Workshop international Essachess: M{\'e}dia, spiritualit{\'e} et la{\"\i}cit{\'e} : Regards crois{\'e}s franco-roumains},
	year = {2015},
	month = {12/2015},
	publisher = {Iarsic},
	organization = {Iarsic},
	address = {Bucarest-Villa Noel},
	abstract = {Le probl{\`e}me que je pose dans ce cadre consiste {\`a} voir quel sont les pratiques des m{\'e}dias de service public {\`a} l{\textquoteright}{\'e}gard des repr{\'e}sentations de la diversit{\'e} religieuse et, plus pr{\'e}cis{\'e}ment, {\`a} l{\textquoteright}{\'e}gard des repr{\'e}sentations de transmission et communication de la foi dans deux pays europ{\'e}ens dont l{\textquoteright}un fort religieux et l{\textquoteright}autre fort la{\"\i}c, la Roumanie et la France. Il est question de voir en quoi le discours des m{\'e}dias publics sur la diversit{\'e} n{\textquoteright}alt{\`e}re pas le principe de la la{\"\i}cit{\'e}, la neutralit{\'e}, le respect du pluralisme et l{\textquoteright}int{\'e}gralit{\'e} des consciences. Pour ce faire, je vais retenir deux cas de figure, deux {\'e}missions t{\'e}l{\'e}vis{\'e}es diffus{\'e}es sur les cha{\^\i}nes publiques de t{\'e}l{\'e}vision en France et en Roumanie : l{\textquoteright}{\'e}mission {\guillemotleft} Le jour du Seigneur {\guillemotright}, avec ses d{\'e}clinaisons d{\textquoteright}intitul{\'e} au fil du temps {\guillemotleft} Programme du dimanche {\guillemotright} et {\guillemotleft} Les chemins de la foi {\guillemotright}, diffus{\'e}e sur France 2 et {\guillemotleft} Universul credintei {\guillemotright} ({\guillemotleft} l{\textquoteright}Univers de la foi {\guillemotright}) diffus{\'e}e sur TVR1. En consid{\'e}rant ces deux programmes de t{\'e}l{\'e}vision, je vais tenter de r{\'e}pondre globalement aux questionnements suivants : est-ce que tous les mouvements religieux sont-ils pr{\'e}sents dans les m{\'e}dias audiovisuels publics autant que les acteurs des confessions religieuses traditionnellement implant{\'e}es ? Oui, c{\textquoteright}est une r{\'e}alit{\'e}, certains mouvements disposent de leurs propres cha{\^\i}nes, mais leur pr{\'e}sence sur leurs cha{\^\i}nes priv{\'e}es ne remplace pas un droit par un autre. S{\textquoteright}agit-t-il alors d{\textquoteright}une situation de monopole et de visibilit{\'e} maximale des courants religieux dominants dans l{\textquoteright}espace public au travers des m{\'e}dias publics ? Plus de normalisation garantit plus d{\textquoteright}acc{\`e}s compte tenu que le principe de la{\"\i}cit{\'e} pr{\'e}voit l{\textquoteright}{\'e}galit{\'e} et l{\textquoteright}absence de hi{\'e}rarchie entre les diff{\'e}rentes croyances et cultes ?},
	keywords = {cultural diversity, Faith, freedom of opinion, laicism, pluralism, public institution, religion, religious community representation, Television},
	isbn = {978-2-9532450-6-6},
	url = {http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/45739/ssoar-2015-tudor-Representations_de_la_diversite_religieuse.pdf?sequence=3},
	author = {Tudor, Mihaela-Alexandra}
}
@article {1893,
	title = {Multi-mediatization and religious event: the case of the evangelical campaign "Horizon of Hope" on Hope Channel Romania (Speranta TV)/Multim{\'e}diatisation et {\'e}v{\'e}nement religieux :  le cas de la campagne d{\textquoteright}{\'e}vang{\'e}lisation l{\textquoteright}{\guillemotleft} Horizon de l{\textquoteright}esp{\'e}rance {\guillemotright} de Hope },
	journal = {tic\&soci{\'e}t{\'e}},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2015},
	month = {12/2015},
	abstract = {Multi-mediatization and religious event: the case of the evangelical campaign "Horizon of Hope" on Hope Channel Romania (Speranta TV) {\textendash} In this article we will question how the religious media engages with the new Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) for evangelization by reconstructing neo-protestant Hope Channel Romania{\textquoteright}s (Speranta TV) work to implement the evangelical "Horizon of Hope" campaign. Considering that ICTs cannot be regarded yet as stabilized, we suggest that the product of media evangelization created by this religious media is rooted in the logic of cross media convergence between old and new media rather than in a logic of transfer of authority toward the new media.
***
Dans cet article nous questionnons les formes d{\textquoteright}engagement des m{\'e}dias religieux avec les nouvelles technologies de l{\textquoteright}information et de la communication (NTIC) pour {\guillemotleft} {\'e}vang{\'e}liser {\guillemotright} en reconstituant le chemin fait par la cha{\^\i}ne de t{\'e}l{\'e}vision n{\'e}o-protestante Hope Channel Romania (Speranta TV) pour la mise en {\oe}uvre de la campagne d{\textquoteright}{\'e}vang{\'e}lisation l{\textquoteright} {\guillemotleft} Horizon de l{\textquoteright}esp{\'e}rance {\guillemotright}. Si l{\textquoteright}on consid{\`e}re que les NTIC ne sont pas encore stabilis{\'e}es, l{\textquoteright}hypoth{\`e}se mise {\`a} l{\textquoteright}{\'e}preuve ici consiste {\`a} montrer que le produit d{\textquoteright}{\'e}vang{\'e}lisation multim{\'e}dia cr{\'e}{\'e} par Speranta TV s{\textquoteright}inscrit davantage dans la logique de la convergence cross-media des m{\'e}dias traditionnels et des nouveaux m{\'e}dias que dans la logique du {\guillemotleft} transfert d{\textquoteright}autorit{\'e} {\guillemotright} vers les nouveaux m{\'e}dias.},
	keywords = {convergence cross media, evangelization, neo-Protestant media, New Media},
	doi = {10.4000/ticetsociete.1840},
	url = {https://ticetsociete.revues.org/1840$\#$quotation},
	author = {Tudor, Mihaela-Alexandra}
}
