@article {2130,
	title = {Identity Politics in a Mediatized Religious Environment on Facebook: Yes to Wearing the Cross Whenever and Wherever I Choose},
	journal = {Journal of Religion in Europe},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {457 {\textendash} 486},
	abstract = {The Norwegian Facebook page Yes to Wearing the Cross Whenever and Wherever I Choose was initially created to protest the prohibition of the cross for NRK news anchors. Yet, many of the discussions and audience interactions transpired into heated religio-political debates with strong elements of anti-Muslim, xenophobic, anti-secular, and anti-atheist sentiments. This study aims to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between media and religion by providing new insights on the variety of ways in which media audiences may {\textquoteleft}add a series of dynamics to conflicts, namely, amplification, framing and performative agency, and co-structuring{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}perform conflict{\textquoteright}, as formulated by Hjarvard et al. It is argued that mediatized conflicts with inherent trigger themes, which tug at core religio-political identity issues, also tend to evoke emotional responses, which, in turn, inspire social media users to perform the conflict in ways that multiply the conflict(s).},
	keywords = {Facebook, mediatized, Politics, religious},
	url = {http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/18748929-01004001},
	author = {Abdel-Fadil, M}
}
@inbook {2128,
	title = {The Logics of the Media and the Mediatized Conditions of Social Interaction},
	booktitle = {Media Logic(s) Revisited},
	number = { Transforming Communications {\textendash} Studies in Cross-Media Research},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {63-84},
	publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan, Cham},
	organization = {Palgrave Macmillan, Cham},
	abstract = {The notion of {\textquoteleft}media logics{\textquoteright} is useful for understanding the processes of mediatization and the ways in which media come to influence communication and social interaction in various domains of society. Media logics are the combined technological, aesthetic, and institutional modus operandi of the media and logics may in a general sociological vocabulary be understood as the rules and resources that govern a particular institutional domain. Media logics do{\quotesinglbase} however{\quotesinglbase} rarely exert their influence in isolation. We need to consider the media{\textquoteright}s influence on an aggregate level and not only at the level of the individual media and its particular logics. Mediatization involves cultural and social processes in which logics of both media and other institutions are interacting and adapting to each other and through these processes a particular configuration of logics are established within an institutional domain. Such configurations condition, but do not determine communication and social interaction. Within a particular institution such as politics or education{\quotesinglbase} the available media repertoire inserts various dynamics to communication and social interaction{\quotesinglbase} and these dynamics represent the mediatized conditions of communication and social interaction.},
	keywords = {media, mediatized, social interaction},
	issn = {978-3-319-65755-4},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-65756-1_4},
	author = {Hjarvard, S}
}
